This essay 5 Court Cases has a total of 1814 words and 11 pages.
5 Court Cases
I. Name and Citation
STATE OF FLORIDA, versus SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA
II. Key Facts
In this complaint, the the Tribe was operating "electronic or electromechanical facsimiles of games of chance" and that such operations constituted class III gaming as defined by IGRA. These games were operated despite the absence of a compact between the Tribe and the State regarding the regulation of class III gaming. The State also alleged that the Tribe planned to construct a new facility on its lands in order to conduct additional class III gaming.
III. The Issue
Does the operation of such games without a Tribal-State compact violate both federal and state law?
IV. Holding and Vote
No (Opinion by Justice Stevens)
Congress abrogated tribal immunity from state suits that seek declaratory or injunctive relief for alleged tribal violations of IGRA; (2) the Tribe, by electing to engage in gaming under IGRA, waived its immunity from a suit to require compliance with the statutory conditions precedent to class III gaming; and (3) tribal immunity does not necessarily extend to actions seeking prospective equitable relief. Congress may abrogate a sovereign\'s immunity only by using statutory language that makes its intention unmistakably clear, and that ambiguities in federal laws implicating Indian rights must be resolved in the Indians\' favor. The Supreme Court has made it plain that waivers of tribal sovereign immunity cannot be implied on the basis of a tribe\'s actions, but must be unequivocally expressed. Accordingly, we reject the State\'s argument that the Tribe\'s immunity does not necessarily extend to this action for prospective equitable relief. The district court\'s holding that sovereign immunity bars the State\'s suit against the Tribe is affirmed.
I. Name and Citation
ALDEN et al. v. MAINE
II. Key Facts
Congress lacks power under Article I to abrogate the States\' sovereign immunity in federal court, the Federal District Court dismissed a Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 suit filed by petitioners against their employer, respondent Maine. Subsequently, petitioners filed the same action in state court. Although the FLSA purports to authorize private actions against States in their own courts, the trial court dismissed the suit on the ground of sovereign immunity.
III. The Issue
Does the federal government have authority under Article I to abrogate a State\'s immunity in it\'s own court?
IV. Holding and Vote
Yes. (vote 5-4) (Opinion by Justice Kennedy)
The Constitution\'s structure and history and this Court\'s authoritative interpretations make clear that the States\' immunity from suit is a fundamental aspect of the sovereignty they enjoyed before the Constitution\'s ratification and retain today except as altered by the plan of the Convention or certain constitutional Amendments. The States\' immunity from private suit in their own courts is beyond congressional power to abrogate by Article I legislation. Congress may exercise its Article I powers to subject States to private suits in their own courts only if there is compelling evidence that States were required to surrender this power to Congress pursuant to the constitutional design. A question of first impression. History, practice, precedent, and the Constitution\'s structure show no compelling evidence that this derogation of the States\' sovereignty is inherent in the constitutional compact.
VI. Separate Opinions
Kennedy, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Rehnquist, C. J., and O\'Connor, Scalia, and Thomas, JJ., joined. Souter, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Stevens, Ginsburg, and Breyer, JJ., joined.
I. Name and Citation
BUCKLEY v. FITZSIMMONS ET AL.
II. Key Facts
Petitioner Buckley sought damages from respondent prosecutors for fabricating evidence during the preliminary investigation of a highly publicized rape and murder in Illinois and making false statements at a press conference announcing the return of an indictment against him. He claimed that when three separate lab studies failed to make a reliable connection between a bootprint at the murder site and his boots, respondents obtained a positive identification from one Robbins, who allegedly was known for her willingness to fabricate unreliable expert testimony. Thereafter, they convened a grand jury for the sole purpose of investigating the murder, and 10 months later, respondent Fitzsimmons, the State\'s Attorney, announced the indictment at the news conference. Buckley was arrested and, unable to meet the bond, held in jail. Robbins provided the principal evidence against him at trial, but the jury was unable to reach a
Topics Related to 5 Court Cases
Antonin Scalia, Conservatism in the United States, Michigan v. Bay Mills Indian Community, Sovereign immunity in the United States
Essays Related to 5 Court Cases
Mitchell V. WisconsinMitchell V. Wisconsin On June 11, 1993, the United State Supreme Court upheld Wisconsins penalty enhancement law, which imposes harsher sentences on criminals who intentionally select the person against whom the crime...is committed..because of the race, religion, color, disability, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry of that person. Chief Justice Rehnquist deliverd the opinion of the unanimous Court. This paper argues against the decision, and will attempt to prove the unconstitutio
Mitchell v. Wisconsin: Why Mitchell v. Wisconsin SMitchell v. Wisconsin: Why Mitchell v. Wisconsin Sucked On June 11, 1993, the United State Supreme Court upheld Wisconsin\'s penalty enhancement law, which imposes harsher sentences on criminals who intentionally select the person against whom the crime...is committed..because of the race, religion, color, disability, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry of that person. Chief Justice Rehnquist deliverd the opinion of the unanimous Court. This paper argues against the decision, and w
Mitchell v WisconsinMitchell v Wisconsin Mitchell v. Wisconsin Why Mitchell v. Wisconsin Sucked On June 11, 1993, the United State Supreme Court upheld WisconsinĻs penalty enhancement law, which imposes harsher sentences on criminals who ≥intentionally select the person against whom the crime...is committed..because of the race, religion, color, disability, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry of that person.≤ Chief Justice Rehnquist deliverd the opinion of the unanimous Court. This paper argues against
Freedom Of SpeechFreedom Of Speech Freedom of Speech Meredith Kerr Charles W. Locke U.S. History 121-03 9-27-99 Imagine a time when one could be fined, imprisoned and even killed for just simply speaking oneís mind. Speech is the basic vehicle for communication of beliefs, thoughts and ideas. Without the right to speak oneís mind freely one would be forced to agree with everything society stated. With freedom of speech oneís own ideas can be expressed freely and the followerís belief will be stronger. The words
An Objection to Mandatory Drug Testing in High Sch An Objection to Mandatory Drug Testing in High Schools for the Participation of Extra-Curricular Activities: Primarily Student Athletes For LA: 401: Science, Technology, and Human Values Spring, 2004 Introduction With the recent steroid a scandal in Major League Baseball, debates over mandatory drug testing polices have sparked interest across the country. One issue that is highly controversial, but has taken a back seat in the in the debate, is the issue of mandatory drug testing policies in h
Rectification and CompensationRectification and Compensation ENG 111 Affirmative Action is one of the most controversial civil rights policies ever. Affirmative Action is the process in which minority groups are given preferential treatment in areas such as job hiring and university admissions. Proponents of affirmative action claim that it benefits everyone and that it is a moral necessity in our society. Opponents claim that it actually hurts society by maintaining racial stereotypes and pitting races against each other. S
Capital PunishmentCapital Punishment Capitol punishment is a big issue in America. There is no defiant solution to this problem and I donít think that there will ever be. Capitol punishment is under constant controversy and will be under speculation for many years to come. I believe that capitol punishment should be used in our criminal justice system. The death penalty is a serious punishment for a serious crime. There is no crime more serious than murder. Murders who take away the lives of innocent people shoul
The Presidential Election Of 2000The Presidential Election Of 2000 The Presidential election of 2000 was one of the most controversial and divisive political events in recent history, perfectly illustrating the schism between the two political parties and the almost uncannily equality of these groups. However, this election also showed the nation that although many issues keep these two parties in two distinct camps, an equal number of issues drew very similar responses from the Republican candidate, George W. Bush, and the Dem
The Strengths And Weaknesses Of The American PolitThe Strengths And Weaknesses Of The American Political System Identify and comment on what you see to be the strengths and/or weaknesses of the American system as far as the topics in this section are concerned. The constitutional system of the United States is a puzzling aspect of an American\'s life. Many do not understand. Some think they understand it and with their slight grasp of it they try to offer solutions to better it. I would like to offer a broad concept of the American constitution
Supreme CourtSupreme Court The justices determine which cases to take. They never explain the reason for their choices. Whether or not a case is accepted strikes me as a rather subjective decision, made up in part of intuition and in part of legal judgment, Rehnquist wrote in The Supreme Court: How It Was, How It Is, his 1987 book about the court. Important factors, he said, are whether the legal question has been decided differently by two lower courts and needs resolution by the high court, whether a lower
Abortion And PoliticsAbortion And Politics a∑bor∑tion: n. 1. Induced termination of a pregnancy and expulsion of an embryo or fetus that is incapable of survival. 2. A miscarriage. 3. Cessation of normal growth, esp. of a body part, prior to full development or maturation. 4. An aborted organism. 5. Something malformed or incompletely developed; a monstrosity. ďWe hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among t
US GovernmentUS Government William Jefferson Clinton William Jefferson Clinton was born on August 19, 1946, in Hope, Arkansas. His father, William J. Blythe III was killed in an automobile collision just two months before Williamís birth. At age four, William Jefferson Blythe IV was legally adopted by his mothers second husband, Roger Clinton, making him William Jefferson Clinton. At age 22 William received a Bachelorís degree from Georgetown University. Just five years later, he received his law degree from
US Supreme CourtUS Supreme Court The Supreme Court is the highest governing body that is known to us as the people of the United States of America. In the 1998-99 term, the Supreme Court is slated to hear cases on subjects as diverse as business monopolies, labor unions, health insurers, initiative petitions and due process. The justices will also revisit the issue of sexual harassment. The following will just be an overview of how the Supreme Court operates. I will try to point out many things throughout the c
Checks And BalancesChecks And Balances Constitutional Interpretation The problem of interpreting the Constitution and framers intent is a constantly permeating and troublesome question in the minds of Supreme Court Justices, judges, prominent politicians, and policy makers alike. It is a problem that has been pondered for years and years in the courtrooms and on paper with no real conclusion. One such essay arguing this dilemma is How Not to Read the Constitution by Laurence H. Tribe and Michael C. Dorf, who ex
The Supreme Court SystemThe Supreme Court System The Supreme Court System The justices determine which cases to take. They never explain the reason for their choices. Whether or not a case is accepted strikes me as a rather subjective decision, made up in part of intuition and in part of legal judgment, Rehnquist wrote in The Supreme Court: How It Was, How It Is, his 1987 book about the court. Important factors, he said, are whether the legal question has been decided differently by two lower courts and needs resolutio
The Us GovernmentThe Us Government U.S. Government (History) The United States Government A collection of short reports all dealing with the United States Government. William Jefferson Clinton William Jefferson Clinton was born on August 19, 1946, in Hope, Arkansas. His father, William J. Blythe III was killed in an automobile collision just two months before Williamís birth. At age four, William Jefferson Blythe IV was legally adopted by his mothers second husband, Roger Clinton, making him William Jefferson Cl